Loading...
In 1969, Sears, Roebuck & Co. accounted for 1% of the entire US gross national product. Its catalog reached 60 million American homes — customers could order clothing, appliances, even a prefabricated house, delivered by the company's massive distribution network. Sears owned Allstate Insurance, Discover Card, Coldwell Banker, and Dean Witter, making it a one-stop financial empire decades before fintech existed. Then came the critical fork. In 1993, Sears discontinued its legendary catalog to focus on physical stores — just as the World Wide Web was being opened to commercial traffic. Jeff Bezos launched Amazon from a garage in 1994, building exactly the model Sears had pioneered: a massive catalog, centralized distribution, and customer trust built through convenience. Sears's leadersh...
Popular framing: Sears got fat and lazy and missed the internet; Bezos was just smarter.
Structural analysis: Sears was locked into its own moat: 3,500 stores, 350,000 employees, and a century of catalog dominance made cannibalizing the physical channel feel irrational at every quarterly horizon. Status-quo bias plus path dependence kept the online build perpetually deferred while a clean-slate entrant pioneered Sears's own original model on new infrastructure. Hysteresis then set in — by the time leadership tried to pivot, the configuration that made Sears dominant could not be reshaped fast enough to matter.
The popular narrative locates failure in individual cognition (visionary vs. myopic leaders) rather than in structural path dependence. This matters because it generates the wrong lesson: companies invest in 'innovation culture' and 'disruption awareness' when the actual leverage point is building organizational structures with lower hysteresis — fewer sunk commitments that foreclose future pivots — before the disruption arrives.
